For higher education, across every discipline

Design authentic assessments. Evidence their quality.

Create authentic, AI-aware assessment briefs and evaluate each one against a peer-reviewed framework, in a single workflow.

Built on a framework published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (2026)

From idea to evidence

Design and evaluation belong together. The Studio joins them in one loop.

1

Design

Provide outcomes and context. The Studio drafts a complete, ready-to-adapt brief.

2

Evaluate

One click scores the design, or any existing brief, across six dimensions.

3

Refine and export

Iterate on the findings, then export briefs and reports for quality processes.

A peer-reviewed quality framework

Published in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Criteria, scoring, and thresholds are configurable.

Contextual fidelity Cognitive demand Process transparency Student agency Inclusivity AI-aware validity
Explore the dimensions

Modular by design

Enable only what your institution needs.

Evaluation engine

Core

Six-dimension scoring with evidence, risks, and recommendations.

Assessment Studio

Optional

AI-assisted brief generation, integrated with evaluation.

Custom frameworks

Optional

Evaluate against your own rubric, policy, or accreditation framework.

Institutional context

Optional

Generated designs reflect your regulations and house style.

Reports and exports

Core

PDF reports with radar charts, plus CSV, JSON, and DOCX briefs.

Choice of AI provider

Configurable

Azure OpenAI in your tenancy, or OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini.

Why teams use the framework

Practical value for the people designing assessments and the institutions assuring them.

For educators

Better briefs, in less time

  • Draft a complete, discipline-appropriate assessment brief from your module context in minutes, then adapt it rather than starting from a blank page.
  • Receive evidence-based feedback on any brief before students see it, with specific redesign priorities instead of generic advice.
  • Check that your AI policy is explicit, workable, and aligned with what the assessment actually measures.
  • Strengthen inclusion by surfacing hidden barriers, assumed prior access, unclear criteria, or missing scaffolding, before they affect students.

For institutions

Assurance you can evidence

  • Apply one consistent, peer-reviewed standard to assessment quality across modules, programmes, and campuses.
  • Generate documentation ready for committees, periodic review, accreditation, and external examiners: scores, evidence, and actions per brief.
  • Respond to generative AI with a defensible design strategy rather than detection tools, protecting the validity of your awards.
  • Configure criteria, thresholds, and terminology to your own regulations, and run it inside your own Azure tenancy.

See it in action

The Studio workspace and the evaluation report your team receives.

Assessment Studio
1 · Design 2 · Evaluate 3 · Refine

1. Module information

module-handbook.pdf uploaded

3. Assessment parameters

Duration4 weeks
Weighting40%
Length2,500 words
FormatReport
LevelPG
AI policyAI-enabled

Generated assessment brief

DOCX

Step 2 · Evaluate this design

Run evaluation
78%
Strong

Upload context, set parameters, generate the brief, and score it, all in one screen.

Evaluation report (PDF)
Evaluation report page with overall score and six-dimension radar profile Evaluation report page with per-dimension scores, evidence, and recommendations

Radar profile, per-dimension evidence, and prioritised recommendations, ready for committees and QA.

Ready to see it on your own briefs?

Sign up for the demo and evaluate your first assessment brief in minutes.

Request demo access